The Supreme Court has resumed sitting with the cross-examination of the third witness, for John Mahama, the petitioner in the 2020 election petition.
While the witness Rojo Mettle-Nunoo was supposed to face a cross-examination on Friday, the court adjourned the cross-examination by making various objections to some of its witness claims.
The apex court however took out 5 portions of the statement, leaving 27 paragraphs out of the total 32 submitted by the witness.
The paragraphs that have been struck out are 4, 5, 6, 7 and 18.
Paragraph 4: Claims that the EC Chair did not perform her duties as required by law prior to the declaration of the 2020 presidential results.
Paragraph 5: A request to make available a video recording of happenings in the EC strong room to confirm his [Rojo Mettle] claims of what transpired.
Paragraph 6: Claims that some machines in the strong failed to work at some point and that the fax transmission was slow.
P7: Claims Dr. Sereboe Quaicoe from time to time brought into the strong room documents he claimed to be regional collation sheets without them knowing where he was getting them from.
P18: Claims that with regard to Northern Region, two different summary sheets were brought into the strong room and that the original sheets will be required to authenticate the results.
For any adverts kindly send your ads or stories via email – firstname.lastname@example.org or WhatsApp 0557449200
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube Channel @bibinitv Instagram @bibini_tv Twitter @bibiniqwaku